Legal Opinion

Allen Et Ux v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This is a delicate and difficult case. Plaintiffs-appellants are the adoptive parents of the defendant Debra Jeanne Allen. This is a suit by them attempting to abrogate the adoption proceeding which created that status. The defendant Waverly Baby Home, of Portland, is a licensed child-caring agency, certified as provided by ORS 419.112.

The disposition of the case requires a brief summary of the chronological facts. At the outset of this *666case the trial court wisely entered an order impounding the clerk’s file, rendering it secret. Unfortunately, the record on appeal and this opinion impair the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Furgeson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In re HookSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  3. In re the Adoption of EatonNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Kenning v. ReichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. People Ex Rel. Houghland v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mohr v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. In Re the Adoption of HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Lisa Diane G.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  5. STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT., CLACKAMAS v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API