Legal Opinion

Andrews Farms v. Calcot, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 16, 2010No. Case CV-F-07-0464 LJO DLBPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION (Doc. 170)

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiffs Andrews Farms and Greg Pal-la and members of a class certified as described below (collectively “Plaintiffs”) move for partial summary judgment and summary adjudication against defendant Calcot, Ltd. (“Calcot”) for constructive fraud and deceit based on fiduciary relationship (third cause of action); (2) accounting (fourth cause of action); and (3) breach of contract (fifth cause of action). In addition, Plaintiffs move for summary adjudication in their favor on thirty…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dye v. Communications Ventures III, LP (In re Flashcom, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2013
  2. Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. KreidlerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  3. Justin Lane v. City of Tucson, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Moe v. Geico Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API