Legal Opinion

Neal v. Columbian Mutual Life Assurance Society

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1931No. 29582PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

J. Morgan Stevens,

of Jackson, for appellee.

Where insured, who had paid more than three years premiums on a life policy, procured a loan to the full value of the policy and then defaulted in the payment of the interest premiums and principal, the insurance was not extended under a nonforfeiture clause providing that after three full years premiums should have been paid, the policy should be automatically extended on nonpayment, provided it should be free from debt, since in such case the policy was not free from debt.

Fidelity Mutual Ins. Co. v. Oliver, 111 Miss. 133, 71 So. 302,

Whatever debt…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Cook.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. National Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. BlaylockMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Federal Life Ins. v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  4. Fidelity Mutual Ins. v. OliverMississippi Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henricks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Ringstad v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Steuernagel v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Columbian Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. VasserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Home Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API