Legal Opinion
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Sumi Ohnuma
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*425OPINION OF THE COURT
Jane S. Solomon, J.
In these 16 proceedings, petitioner Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) seeks to stay, permanently, arbitration proceedings brought by the respondents before the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD).1 The petitions each allege that respondents’ claims are ineligible for submission to arbitration under section 15 of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure because they are based on investments made over six years before arbitration was sought. The respondents, in turn, move to dismiss the petitions2 and to compel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Environmental Concern, Inc. v. Larchwood Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. DeChaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Pearl v. The City Of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. OhnumaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Perez v. Police Department of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.