Legal Opinion
Perez v. Police Department of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1994No. 93 Civ. 5622 (JES)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marcos Perez, acting pro se, brings the instant action against the Police Department of the City of New York (“N.Y.P.D.”), Sergeant Luis Castillo, Officer Christopher Fellin and Officer Robert Randall (collectively “defendants”). Perez claims that defendants employed excessive force in violation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants move to dismiss upon the ground that the instant action is barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perez v. Police Department of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Spratley v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Tomassini v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020