Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Spartanburg South Carolina, City of

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 26, 2024No. 7:20-cv-01305Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION John F. Floyd, Gordon Farms, Inc., ) Case No. 7:20-cv-01305-JDA ) Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, ) ) v. ) OPINION AND ORDER ) City of Spartanburg South Carolina, ) )) Defendant/Counter-Claimant. ) This matter is before the Court on a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs filed by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants John F. Floyd (“Mr. Floyd”) and Gordon Farms Inc. (“Gordon Farms”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and a motion to alter or amend judgment filed by Defendant/Counter-Claimant (“the City”). [Docs. 162;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Rickborn v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Evatt v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. City of Charleston v. MasiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API