Legal Opinion

City of Charleston v. Masi

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 14, 2005No. 25941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We dismiss this action as moot and find the trial court did not err by failing to award attorney’s fees to the James Island Public Service District (District).

FACTS

In June 2002, the Town of James Island (Town) was formed. Thereafter, an action was commenced by the City of Charleston (City), a resident and elector of the City who lives on James Island (Kizer), and a taxpayer and elector of the Town (Cabiness) (jointly referred to as City unless otherwise noted). The complaint sought injunctive relief and declaratory relief as to who, after the incorporation of the Town, was entitled to vote in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Heath v. County of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Waters v. South Carolina Land Resources Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. Oconee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Douan v. Charleston County CouncilCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Bailey v. SC State ElectionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  4. Douan v. Charleston County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Floyd v. Spartanburg South Carolina, City ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API