Legal Opinion

Tamagni v. Tax Appeals Tribunal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1998PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wesley, J.

Petitioners, John and Janet Tamagni, contend that the New York State resident income tax (Tax Law art 22) violates the dormant Commerce Clause (US Const, art I, § 8) as applied to statutory residents of this State who claim another State as their domicile. Petitioners argue that, because New York gives no credit for resident income taxes paid to other States on investment income from intangible personal property, such as interest and stock dividends (so-called “intangible income”),1 it *533potentially subjects them to double taxation in violation of the Supreme…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Maryland State Comptroller of the Treasury v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Zelinsky v. Tax Appeals TribunalNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. UrbachNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Luther v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API