Legal Opinion

Pezas v. Pezas

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 12, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.

This was an action instituted in November, 1959, against the defendant husband, here inafter referred to as the defendant, by the plaintiff wife on her own behalf and, through her as next friend, by the three minor children, issue of the marriage, who are also plaintiffs, seeking an equitable order for future support, under the rule of cases such as Artman v. Artman, 111 Conn. 124, 129, 149 A. 246, Smith v. Smith, 114 Conn. 575, 580, 159 A. 489, and Kurzatkowski v. Kurzatkowski, 142 Conn. 680, 681, 116 A.2d 906. See note, 141 A.L.R. 399, 403. A first count seeking reimbursement for past due…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Heflin v. HeflinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Kurzatkowski v. KurzatkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
  2. Atlas Garage & Custom Builders, Inc. v. HurleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. Perlstein v. PerlsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  4. Ivancovich v. IvancovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. City National Bank v. Traffic Engineering Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API