Legal Opinion
Perlstein v. Perlstein
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 10, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
The plaintiff husband instituted this action against the defendant wife, claiming an annulment of their purported marriage. While the complaint lacks clarity, the allegations of fact in the plaintiff’s answer to the defendant’s plea in abatement, admitted by the defendant’s demurrer to that answer, make it clear that the annulment is claimed on the ground that the defendant was legally married to another at the time she went through the marriage ceremony with the plaintiff in Hartford, Connecticut, on August 25, 1959.
The court sustained the demurrer to the plaintiff’s answer to the plea in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cook v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gaines v. JacobsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Edward Manning, and Thomas Gaines, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Hames v. HamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Carabetta v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Dorothy I. MacPherson v. Charles R. MacPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Atchley v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.