Richards v. Crosby
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. — Milo P; Smith, Judge. Action against defendants for the alleged conversion of a promissory note. Trial to a jury, and a verdict and judgment against both defendants. The defendant William Crosby appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
1. Trover and conversion : evidence: sufficiency. A number of questions are assigned as error,’ some of which appellees contend were not properly raised in the district court; but it seems to be conceded by *1356both sides that there are two main questions presented here for determination: First, as to whether there is evidence sufficient to go to the jury and to sustain the finding as to the alleged conversion of the note by the defendant William Crosby; and in regard to Instruction No. 4 These will be taken up first, and the other questions briefly referred to later.
1. The theory upon which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Starr v. Bankers Union of WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Carraher v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Moore v. FrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Bowe v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Wing v. MillikenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McQuillen v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Smith v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942