Legal Opinion

McQuillen v. Meyers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 1932No. 41149PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Error is assigned only to instructions. In brief, the plaintiff’s claim is that she, with her escort, and one other girl, Miss Dolan, ■ after attending a dance, got into defendant’s automobile, which was in the possession of Weidner and was being driven by him with defendant’s consent; that the girls asked that they be taken home; that Weidner instead undertook to drive to a roadhouse; that the pavements were frosty and slippery; that Weidner was angrily arguing with Miss Dolan; that the girls protested against the speed at which he was driving and asked him to drive slower, but he paid no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Neessen v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van VleckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Altfilisch v. WesselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thornbury v. MaleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Smith v. PineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Hart v. HinkleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. D'Addario v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. Harvey v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API