Legal Opinion

United States v. Daoust

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 11, 1989No. Crim. 88-00015-BPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

CONRAD K. CYR, District Judge. *

A three-count superseding indictment charges the defendant with making false representations to obtain a firearm and with receiving and possessing firearms following a felony conviction. The defendant moves to suppress evidence, and the fruits of evidence, seized in connection with a warranted search of his residence.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

As a known associate of Robert Whitte-more, a suspected cocaine dealer, the name of Rodney Daoust first surfaced in mid-1987 in connection with a federal investigation into cocaine…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Rodney J. DaoustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Phillip MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. State v. DomiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. Panarello v. City of VinelandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  5. United States v. Sylvia Sagaribay and Javier Armando RuedaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API