Legal Opinion

Harper v. Amsberry

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 16, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01425Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON DANIEL HARPER, Case No. 2:17-cv-01425-AA Petitioner, | OPINION AND ORDER V. BRIGITTE AMSBERRY, as Superintendent, Respondent. AIKEN, District Judge: Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon Department of Corrections, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he was deprived of his rights to due process, equal protection, and fundamental fairness under the Fourteenth Amendment when the trial court gave a certain jury instruction, and that he received inadequate assistance of counsel when his attorney did not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API