Legal Opinion
Penny v. Orthalliance, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 27, 2003No. 3:01-cv-01569PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GODBEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ amended motion for partial summary judgment filed on December 14, 2001. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
Robert C. Penny (“Penny”), Keith Stewart (“Stewart”), and William M. Reeves (“Reeves”) (the “Individual Plaintiffs”) are doctors of dental surgery, specializing in the practice of orthodontics; the Individual Plaintiffs are all licensed to practice dentistry in Texas. The Defendant, Orthalliance, Inc. (“Orthalliance”), provides business and consulting services to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- G.M. Trading Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Flynn Bros., Inc. v. First Medical Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Sacks v. Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Emergency Consultants, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- In Re OCA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Clower v. Orthalliance, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Crosby v. Orthalliance New ImageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- American Academy of Emergency Medicine v. Memorial Hermann Healthcare System, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.