Legal Opinion
Sacks v. Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided October 24, 1986No. 05-85-01231-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCRAW, Justice.
Greg Sacks filed suit against Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange, Inc. (DGSE) and G. Michael Oyster, seeking enforcement of an agreement to pay accrued compensation allegedly due to him at the time his DGSE employment ended. The jury found that DGSE breached its agreement to pay Sacks and that DGSE forced Sacks to resign due to his refusal to carry out a fraudulent rent reduction scheme. The trial court, however, sustained DGSE’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and ordered that Sacks take nothing. Sacks now appeals from this judgment in three points of error…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Dowling v. NADW Marketing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Morrison v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Baron v. Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy & Baab, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Hazelwood v. Mandrell Industries Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Texas a & M University-Kingsville v. Lawson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Peeler v. Hughes & Luce, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Grider v. Boston Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Ranger Insurance Co. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- General Agents Insurance Co. of America v. Naggar, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.