State v. Liddell
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell
Defendant James Liddell was convicted of sexual intercourse without consent following a jury trial in the District Court of Yellowstone County. He appeals from the judgment entered therein. We affirm.
Liddell claims that he and the victim had been acquainted for some time. He maintains that prior to the night in question she had accepted long distance collect calls from him and had agreed to let him stay with her the night of the incident. Liddell also states that he and the victim had sexual intercourse on a prior occasion and that she consented again to sexual intercourse on the night in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McKenzieMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MarksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- State v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- People v. LaPorteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.