Legal Opinion
In re Anonymous No. 135 D.B. 94 & 38 D.B. 95
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 12, 1996No. Disciplinary Board Docket nos. 135 D.B. 94 and 38 D.B. 95Published
1Opinion of the Court
CARSON, Member,
Pursuant to Rule 208(d) (2) (iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your Honorable Court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.
I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS
On November 9, 1994, a petition for discipline was filed against respondent, [ ], in the case of 135 D.B. 94. Respondent did not file an answer. Petitioner filed a second petition for discipline against respondent on March 27,1995, in the case of 38 D.B. 95. Simultaneous to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DuffieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PassynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994