Cal Pak Delivery, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.—
Introduction
In this case we determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in disqualifying Attorney Michael N. Khourie as counsel for Cal Pak Delivery, Inc. (Cal Pak) where Khourie admitted he had offered to sell out his client and the class which the client was seeking to represent for a payment to himself personally of approximately $8 to $10 million. We believe that to state the question is to answer it.
We also address the related question of whether the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that Khourie could receive no attorney’s fees either for work…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Maxwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Reena Frailich v. Sandra DisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.