Legal Opinion

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Regents of the University of Michigan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 18, 2008No. Nos. 06-15024, 06-15637PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART UNIVERSITY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING CANTRELL PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING CONSOLIDATED CASES

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in these consolidated actions challenge the constitutionality of an amendment to Michigan’s state constitution that was adopted by a majority vote of the electorate at the November 2006 election. The amendment, referred to throughout this opinion as Proposal 2, prohibits the State and its political…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. CORAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigration Rights v. Regents of the University of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  4. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights & Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights v. Regents of the University of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API