Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights v. Regents of the University of Michigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J., joined by Daughtrey, J.,
GIBBONS, J. (pp. 633-46), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Proposal 2 is a successful voter-initiated amendment to the Michigan Constitution. In relevant part, it prohibits Michigan’s public colleges and universities from granting “preferential treatment to[ ] any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.” Mich. Const, ai't. I, § 26. Our task is to determine whether Proposal 2 is constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schuette v. Coal. to Defend Affirmative ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights & Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights & Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights v. Regents of the University of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Schuette v. BAMNSupreme Court of the United States · 2014