Legal Opinion

McIlroy v. Fugitt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This suit originated in an action by the First National Bank of Fayetteville against Kate Fugitt, E. C. Fugitt, J. H. McIlroy, and J. H. McIlroy as trustee. The Fugitts had executed to the bank a note securing a debt of $17,000, one note for $15,000 and two notes for $1,000 each. These last two notes had been assigned by the bank without recourse to McIlroy with the understanding, that they were inferior to the lien of the mortgage on the $15,000 note. After this transaction the Fugitts ¡borrowed more money from McIlroy who was representing himself and others and to secure the same executed a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guynn v. McCauleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
  2. Cotton v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Jacks v. DyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  4. Frierson v. BranchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  5. Ross v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connecticut General Life Insurance v. SpeerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Warren Company v. NeelDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
  3. Denniston, County Judge v. RiddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Jones v. NixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Casey v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API