Legal Opinion
Mountain Corp. v. Rose
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
Decided July 8, 1987No. 08-86-00351-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OSBORN, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from an order overruling a motion for new trial following the entry of a post-answer default judgment in a suit based upon promissory notes and a stock purchase agreement. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Defendants Mountain Corporation, West Hueco Corporation and W.T. Rose Enterprises, Inc., all filed an answer in this case. The judgment recites that all three, “although duly notified of this trial, did not appear and wholly made default.” An order had been entered the preceding day permitting counsel for those defendants to withdraw. Mountain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Rogers v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Seale v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carstar Collision, Inc. v. Mercury Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Stein v. Meachum, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Adib C. Rouhana v. Alberto Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018
- Jefferies v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- McLamore v. McLamoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.