Legal Opinion
Gary v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 2012No. 12-2257UnpublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Robert L. Gary, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of his complaint with prejudice. For the reasons set forth below, we will summarily affirm.
I
In February 2008, Gary, an African-American male, worked for Holiday Inn as a “chamber maid” and “houseman.” (Dkt. No. 6, ¶¶ 11-14.) After his discharge in March 2009, he applied for and was initially denied unemployment benefits because Holiday Inn failed to report a portion of his earnings. (Id. ¶¶ 15-16.) Because he then experienced a delay in receiving his benefits, Gary filed a charge of…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- El v. People's Emergency Ctr.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Lempert v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Wigton v. BerryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Worth & Co. v. GetzieDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- ATKINSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PHILADELPHIA BRANCHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.