Legal Opinion

Wigton v. Berry

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-01768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARK R. HORNAK, District Judge.

The question before the Court is whether it has subject matter jurisdiction to entertain a lawsuit on behalf of federal retirees who assert that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is deliberately refusing to properly pay them the annuities to which OPM has conceded they are statutorily entitled, or whether their grievance instead must be channeled only through an administrative review scheme created by Congress. In many ways, this question goes to the heart of this Court’s judicial power under Article III and the applicable statutes.

I. BACKGROUND

The…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Folks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Wiedis v. Dreambuilder Investments, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Audrey Gorgonzola v. Director United States OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. EVANS v. DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. HUDSON v. AHUJADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API