Stanfield v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NOCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the plaintiff’s petition for attorney’s fees (Doc. No. 24). The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Plaintiff Larry B. Stanfield asks this court to award attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The EAJA provides for the award of fees and expenses to a prevailing party who submits a timely application for fees, unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Albert JACKSON, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Adams v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Avis v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Barnes v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Boyer v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Brooks v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.