Legal Opinion

United States v. Valenzuela

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided August 31, 1987No. ACMR MISC 8701361PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GILLEY, Judge:

The government appeals, pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (Supp. II 1984) [hereinafter UCMJ], and Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial 908(b) [hereinafter M.C.M., 1984], a ruling by the military judge suppressing results of a urinalysis implicating appellee. These test results are essential evidence with respect to Specification 2 of the Charge alleging wrongful use of cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ.

I. Facts

Appellee serves in a “rapid deployment” company of an infantry…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BickelU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. MurphyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. BickelU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API