Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Williams

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 30, 1988No. ACMR 8700524, ACMR 8702646Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

GILLEY, Judge,

with whom

Judge GIUNTINI

concurs, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

Koh pleaded guilty, pertinently, to violating United States Forces Korea Regulation 27-5, 25 October 1983 [hereinafter USFK Reg. 27-5], a lawful general regulation, by failing to disclose his continued possession or lawful disposition of items he brought into Korea duty-free or acquired there without the payment of duty or tax. In this appeal, Koh asserts that the fifth amendment precluded his prosecution for failure to disclose in accordance with the regulation. See United States v. Covington, 395 U.S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API