Legal Opinion

United States v. Bickel

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 4, 1988No. ACMR 8800197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMKEWICZ, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted of wrongful use of marijuana and absence without leave in violation of Articles 112a and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 886, respectively [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and forfeiture of $438.00 pay per month for four months. The convening authority approved the sentence.

On 10 June 1987 appellant submitted a urine sample which tested positive for marijuana. Appellant’s company commander received the test results on 17 July. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. MoellerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API