McCorkle v. Weinstein
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA
The plaintiff, Charles McCorkle, Jr., a court reporter, brought this action against the defendant, Burton I. Weinstein, an attorney, for court reporting services rendered in the amount of *1,974.45. At a trial without a jury, the trial court at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case entered judgment in favor of the defendant. In so holding, the court specifically found that defendant had been retained as an attorney by a client and had acted as an agent for that client in requesting plaintiff to furnish court reporting services; that the client was known to plaintiff at the time said order had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burt v. GahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Petrando v. BarryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Judd & Detweiler, Inc. v. GittingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
- C. C. Plumb Mixes, Inc. v. StoneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. TrugmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Storm & Associates, Ltd. v. CuculichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Thilman & Co. v. EspositoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Martin-Trigona v. Bloomington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Molezzo Reporters v. PattNevada Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.