Molezzo Reporters v. Patt
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
This action was commenced to recover a stipulated sum of money allegedly due Molezzo Reporters for reporting services rendered by them to Attorney Patt at his request. Patt did not expressly disclaim responsibility for their charges until later, when he declined personally to pay their bills. Neither did he advise the reporters that he personally would be responsible for their charges when their services were engaged.
The district court found Patt not liable in these circumstances. Its decision was premised upon the ordinary rule that an agent is not personally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burt v. GahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Gottwals v. RencherNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- McCorkle v. WeinsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Wehrheim v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by18 opinions
- Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Dezzani v. Kern & Assocs., Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Jackson v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2000
- Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bero-Wachs v. Law Office of Logar & PulverNevada Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.