Legal Opinion

Curnutt v. Holk

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1962No. Civ. 25473PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.

Plaintiff has attempted to appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. That order is not appealable. (Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [252 P.2d 1].) A notice of appeal from such a nonappealable order may be liberally construed as an appeal from the judgment if there is a judgment. (Evola v. Wendt Construction Co., 158 Cal.App.2d 658 [323 P.2d 158]; Smith v. Smith, 126 Cal.App.2d 194 [272 P.2d 118] ; Crane v. Livingston, 98 Cal.App.2d 699 [220 P.2d 744].) The record here contains a document signed by the trial judge entitled “Order Sustaining Demurrer” which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Evola v. Wendt Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Crane v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weiss v. MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hayter Trucking, Inc. v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. ClausenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Oeth v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API