Gary Robert Williams v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Williams appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues that the Parole Commission erred in reopening his presumptive parole date because there was no “new adverse information,” and, in the alternative, that the Parole Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously in setting his new presumptive parole date. We affirm.
*1061I. The Facts.
Williams is a federal prisoner confined in a California state prison at San Quentin, to which he was transferred from the federal penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia, because his life was believed to be in danger in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McClanahan v. MulcromeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Philippe Bernard Izsak v. Maurice H. Sigler, Chairman, United States Parole Commission, United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Zannino v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fred Lenn Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- James W. McQuerry v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Armando Torres-Macias v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- William Grant Goble v. Robert Matthews Warden, Fci, Lexington, Ky. And U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.