Legal Opinion

Salin Bank and Trust Co. v. Violet U. Peden Trust

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1999No. 09A05-9810-CV-495PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge

Salin Bank and Trust Company (“Salin”) appeals various judgments which ultimately resulted in an order directing Salin to purchase certain real estate owned by the Violet U. Peden Trust (“Peden”) pursuant to an option to purchase contained in a lease agreement between Salin and Peden. Salin raises three issues for our review:

I. Whether the trial court erred by concluding a valid option contract existed.

II. Whether the trial court erred by concluding that Salin had exercised the option.

III. Whether the trial court erred by awarding Peden specific performance of the option.

We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wickey v. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Broadhead v. Bonita Lakes Mall, Ltd. PartnershipMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Claise v. BernardiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Fetz v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Straus v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rogier v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Humphries v. AblesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Kesler v. MarshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Metro Holdings One, Llc, Exproman, Inc., and Quaker Sales & Distribution v. Flynn Creek Partner, LlcIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Wenning v. CalhounIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API