Legal Opinion

Parkerson v. Borst

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1920No. 8104PublishedCited by 22 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Eoster, Judge. Action at law by Louise Stone Borst against Camilla Putnam Par-kerson, testamentary executrix of the estate of William S. Parkerson, deceased. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error was before this ■court at a former day as appellant. 251 F.ed. 242, 163 C. C. A. 398. *762That appeal determined that the court a quo had jurisdiction of the cause, but that the cause, being not of equitable, but of legal, cognizance, the decree must be Reversed, and the cause remanded for trial to a jury. This writ of error eventuates from that trial.

The transcript does not purport to contain a complete statement of the evidence, but it sufficiently appears from the admissions in the pleadings, the bills of exceptions, and other portions of the record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parkerson v. BorstCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Winget v. RockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Tuscon Title Insurance Company v. D'AscoliArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Fiske v. BuderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API