Legal Opinion
United States v. Denham
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided September 8, 2009No. 5:09-cr-00007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
ROBERT E. WIER, United States Magistrate Judge.
The District Judge referred pending motions for rearraignment to the undersigned. See DE # 53 (Order). The Court commenced a Rule 11 hearing as to Defendant Christina Rose Denham after receiving her consent, see DE #56 (Consent), and the hearing as to Defendant Brandon Bruce Pitman was set to follow.
The Government has charged Denham and Pitman with conspiring to threaten bodily injury to a person for “providing information related to the possible commission of a federal offense ... to a law enforcement officer, a violation of 18…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CottoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020