Legal Opinion

Roberts v. North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2015No. 20140433PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] William Samuel Roberts appeals from a district court judgment affirming an order of the Department of Transportation revoking his driving privileges for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Roberts argues the district court erred by affirming the hearing officer’s decision revoking Roberts’ license for two years based upon his refusal to submit to a chemical test because Roberts submitted to an onsite screening test prior to being arrested for driving under the influence. We affirm.

I

[¶2] In March 2014, the Burlington Police Chief Philip Crabb observed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Brewer v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Painte v. Director, Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Yellowbird v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jangula v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Schulke v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Sutton v. N.D. Dept. of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Jesser v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Havemeier v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API