Roberts v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] William Samuel Roberts appeals from a district court judgment affirming an order of the Department of Transportation revoking his driving privileges for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Roberts argues the district court erred by affirming the hearing officer’s decision revoking Roberts’ license for two years based upon his refusal to submit to a chemical test because Roberts submitted to an onsite screening test prior to being arrested for driving under the influence. We affirm.
I
[¶2] In March 2014, the Burlington Police Chief Philip Crabb observed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Olmstead v. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Brewer v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Painte v. Director, Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Yellowbird v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jangula v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Schulke v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Sutton v. N.D. Dept. of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Jesser v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Havemeier v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.