Jangula v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jody Jangula appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision suspending his driving privileges for two years. We affirm, concluding the hearing officer did not abuse its discretion in admitting the analytical report of a blood sample into evidence at the administrative hearing.
' I
[¶2] In January 2015 Jangula was charged with actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence. Jangula was issued a report and notice form, notifying him of the Department’s intent to suspend his driving privileges.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Knudson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Schlosser v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Painte v. Director, Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christianson v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Opp v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- McClintock v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Hewitt v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Kastet v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.