Legal Opinion

Jangula v. North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2016No. 20150286PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jody Jangula appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer’s decision suspending his driving privileges for two years. We affirm, concluding the hearing officer did not abuse its discretion in admitting the analytical report of a blood sample into evidence at the administrative hearing.

' I

[¶2] In January 2015 Jangula was charged with actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence. Jangula was issued a report and notice form, notifying him of the Department’s intent to suspend his driving privileges.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Knudson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Schlosser v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Painte v. Director, Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Christianson v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Opp v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. McClintock v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Hewitt v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Kastet v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API