Gabriel Eliajah Montoya v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, Justice.
[¶1] After his first jury trial ended in a mistrial, a second jury found Gabriel Eliajah Montoya guilty of felony stalking. Mr. Montoya appeals his conviction, claiming his second trial violated his right against double jeopardy because the prosecutor provoked him into moving for a mistrial. We affirm.
ISSUE
[¶2] We rephrase the issue as follows: Were Mr. Montoya’s rights against double jeopardy violated when he was tried again after his first trial ended in a mistrial?
FACTS
[ITS] Mr. Montoya was charged by Information with felony stalking in violation of Wyo. Stab Ann. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Masias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Daniel Ray Bowlsby v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garriott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Drakeford v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Marquise Deshawn Flynn v. State of Alabama. (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-18-1178).Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2024