Legal Opinion

King v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2017No. S-16-0203PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUTZ, Justice.

[¶1] A jury convicted Justin Tanner King of felonious restraint, strangulation of a household member, and domestic battery. Mr. King’s first trial resulted in a mistrial at his request after the district court determined that the prosecutor asked Mr. King improper questions during cross-examination. Before the second trial began, Mr. King requested that the case against him be dismissed based on the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against double jeopardy. The district court denied Mr. King’s motion and Mr. King appeals that decision. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] The issue in this case is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. NewmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. TafoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Mark Daniel Byerly v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Garriott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Christopher David Harrell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Ryan Scott Simmons v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API