Legal Opinion

Seminole Townsite Co. v. Town of Seminole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1913No. 2204PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court„ Seminole County; Robt. M. Rainey, Judge. Action by the Seminole Townsite Company against the Town of Seminole and the members of its Board of Trustees and Clerk to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance providing for the construction of sidewalks in front of various lots owned by plaintiff in a certain town. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for the purpose of enjoining the enforcement of a certain town ordinance, which provides for the construction of sidewalks in front of various lots owned by the plaintiff in the town of Seminole. The court below granted a temporary injunction, which, upon full hearing, it declined to make permanent, and it is to reverse this action of the court that this proceeding in error was commenced.

Counsel for plaintiff in error contend that the ordinance attacked is void, for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Le Feber v. Village of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitson v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Peerless Realty & Operating Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. E. G. Rall Grain Co. v. First State Bank of McQueenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Ex Parte DraughnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. City of Duncan v. RiviereSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API