Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Draughn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1933No. A-8601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges he is unlawfully restrained by the chief of police of the city of Ada for an alleged violation of Ordinance 624, which prohibits the operation of pool halls within said city; that he was assessed a fine and costs in the sum of $19.75; that said ordinance is void and the restraint illegal.

The city of Ada is operating under a charter form of government. February 9, 1915, it enacted Ordinance 334, prohibiting the operation of a pool or billiard hall in said city, fixing a maximum punishment at a fine of $100. On June 12, 1919,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Atchison v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Seminole Townsite Co. v. Town of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Callaway v. City of EdmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Whitson v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API