Legal Opinion
City of Austin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 16, 2014No. 03-13-00551-CVPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. WOODFIN JONES, Chief Justice.
The City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy (“the City”) appeals the trial court’s denial of its Rule 91a motion to dismiss inverse-condemnation claims and common-law tort claims asserted against it by appellees Liberty Mutual Insurance; Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana; Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America; Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company; The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company; Travelers Commercial Insurance Company (collectively, “the Insurers”); and Daniel and Katherine Sterns, Individually and as Next Friend of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- William Carl Wooley v. Randy Schaffer, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Reaves v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In re ButtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Virginia Dailey and John W. Dailey v. Audrey Adickes Thorpe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- HMT Tank Service LLC and HMT LLC D/B/A and F/K/A HMT, Inc. v. American Tank & Vessel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.