Legal Opinion

Patel v. Sullivan, No. Cv-00-0437922 S (Aug. 2, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 2, 2002No. CV-00-0437922 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

This proceeding is an appeal from the assessment incidental to a condemnation.

Because of the transposition of their respective names in the present action, the parties have erroneously designated the commission of transportation as the plaintiff and Dinu Patel et al., as the defendants. The named condemnees will be subsequently designated as "the owner," and the condemnor, the commissioner of transportation, will be subsequently designated as "the commissioner."

The premises consist as follows:

Said…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  3. Minicucci v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Appeal of PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. Alemany v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API