Legal Opinion
Mississippi v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 23, 2013No. Nos. 08-1200, 08-1202, 08-1203, 08-1204, 08-1206PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
In this opinion, we consider several challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s most recent revisions to the primary and secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone. For the reasons given below, we deny the petitions, except with respect to the secondary ozone standard, which we remand for reconsideration.
I
The Clean Air Act directs EPA to establish and periodically review and revise primary and secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”) for certain pollutants the “emissions of which ... cause or contribute to air…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Catawba County v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Communities for a Better Environment v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- National Lifeline Association v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Murray Energy Corporation v. EPACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.