Legal Opinion

National Lifeline Association v. FCC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 1, 2019No. 18-1026; C/w 18-1080PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogers, Circuit Judge:

Responding to Congressional directives, the Federal Communications Commission has adopted programs to make voice and broadband services more available and affordable for low-income consumers by providing a discount on these services through its Lifeline program. Since 1985, eligible low-income consumers may receive a monthly discount of $9.25 on qualifying services, and since 2000, low-income consumers living on Tribal lands may receive an additional $25 per month for these services through the Tribal Lifeline program in recognition of the additional hurdles to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Reymundo Mendoza v. Thomas PerezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mozilla Corporation v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Mock v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  3. Huawei Tech USA v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  4. National Lifeline Association v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  5. Chamber of Com of the USA v. SECCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API