Legal Opinion
Doe v. McDaniel College, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 6, 2020No. 1:20-cv-01890Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * JOHN DOE, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil No. SAG-20-1890 * MCDANIEL COLLEGE, INC., * * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION John Doe (“Plaintiff”) filed an Amended Complaint against Defendant McDaniel College, Inc. (“McDaniel”), alleging, in relevant part, violations of Title IX. ECF 47. McDaniel has filed a Partial Motion to Dismiss Claim IV of the Amended Complaint. ECF 48. Plaintiff filed an opposition, ECF 52, and McDaniel filed a reply, ECF 55. No hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Gordon Goines v. Valley Community Services BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.