Legal Opinion

Auto-Fedan Hay Press Co. v. Ward

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1913No. 17,911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Marion district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was brought by appellant to recover on a promissory note for $125, with interest, and upon an unpaid balance of an account of $75 and interest, the note and account being for the purchase price of a hay press.

*219.-The answer of the defendant set up four grounds of defense. The first was a general denial; the second admitted the purchase of the hay press, but alleged that it was sold to him by the plaintiff upon the following written and printed warranty:

“The Auto-Fedan Hay Press is sold under the following guarantee and agreement;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. P. Weybrich & Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Cookingham v. DusaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Gale Sulky Harrow Manufacturing Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Salina Implement & Seed Co. v. HaleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Hull v. Prairie Queen Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Muenzenmayer v. HaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Barber Medicine Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API