Legal Opinion

Muenzenmayer v. Hay

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1916No. 20,107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Geary district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendants appeal from a judgment rendered against them on notes given for the purchase of a gasoline engine and plows. The order for the engine, signed by defendant Robert M. Hay, had printed thereon the following warranty:

“The seller warrants the within described engine to do good work, to be well made, of good materials, and durable if used with proper care. If upon trial, with proper care, the engine fails to work well, the purchaser shall immediately give written notice to the seller, stating wherein the engine fails, shall allow…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scott v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. McKayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Collins v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. P. Weybrich & Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Harris v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Cox v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Bryson v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Farmers Grain & Mercantile Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API