Cookingham v. Dusa
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from McPherson District Court. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On June 25, 1883, Peter Dusa purchased of M. K. Lewis & Son, through their agent, B. Cookingham, a *230“Lewis header,” and in payment executed his two promissory notes for $125 each, and paid $15 freight on the machine. One of the notes was transferred and assigned to the agent, Cookingham, who, on August 12, 1884, commenced his action against Lusa to recover the amount thereof. In his answer the defendant admitted the execution of the note, but alleged as a defense that there was a warranty given at the time of his purchase of the machine;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boothby v. ScalesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- P. Weybrich & Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Kingsley v. WallisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1836
- Holbrook v. BurtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1839
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pratt-Gilbert Co. v. RenaudArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Hull v. Prairie Queen Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Sylvester v. LyndeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Gale Sulky Harrow Manufacturing Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.